• SKÁLD

    Elverhøy • Huldufólk

  • 5 translations
Favorites
Share
Font Size
Original lyrics

Elverhøy lyrics

Jeg lagde mitt hoved til elverhøy
Mine øyne de finge en dvale
Der kom gangende unge alver to
Som gjerne ville med meg tale
 
”Statt opp, vakker jomfru
Om du vilt dansen røre”
Alle små fugle begyndte at kvitre i dale
”Statt opp, vakker jomfru
Om du vilt dansen røre”
Alle små fugle begyndte at kvitre i dale
 
Den ene begyndte en vise at kvede
Så favrt over alle kvinder
Striden strøm, den stildes derved
Som før var van at rinde
 
”Statt opp, vakker jomfru
Om du vilt dansen røre”
Alle små fugle begyndte at kvitre i dale
”Statt opp, vakker jomfru
Om du vilt dansen røre”
Alle små fugle begyndte at kvitre i dale
 
”Da ville vi kunne deg runene
Dertil at lese og skrive”
De danset ut, de danset inn
Alt i den elverferd
 
”Da ville vi kunne deg runene
Dertil at lese og skrive”
”Statt opp, vakker jomfru
Om du vilt dansen røre”
Alle små fugle begyndte at kvitre i dale
 
”Da ville vi kunne deg runene
Dertil at lese og skrive”
”Statt opp, vakker jomfru
Om du vilt dansen røre”
Alle små fugle begyndte at kvitre i dale
 
”Da ville vi kunne deg runene
Dertil at lese og skrive”
”Statt opp, vakker jomfru
Om du vilt dansen røre”
Alle små fugle begyndte at kvitre i dale
 
De danset ut, de danset inn
Alt i den elverferd
De danset ut, de danset inn
Alt i den elverferd
De danset ut, de danset inn
 

 

Translations of "Elverhøy"
SKÁLD: Top 3
Collections with "Elverhøy"
Comments
altermetaxaltermetax
   Sun, 12/02/2023 - 15:38

[@Icey] qui sbaglio o il terzo verso inizia per "Der" invece che per "Ser"? È così sia nel tuo video che nel video ufficiale col testo

IceyIcey
   Sun, 12/02/2023 - 15:43

Oops, hai molto ragione, grazie!

IceyIcey
   Fri, 03/03/2023 - 15:57

The one used here is also official, and I think it's best to keep that one instead, considering it's a lyric video.

SirquacksSirquacks    Wed, 03/04/2024 - 16:25

[@Icey] I’m sorry if this is the wrong place to ask, but what are the differences in dano-Norwegian, and modern Norwegian? Is it simply just a different dialect perhaps? I ask as I’m interested in learning both, as well as old Norse and Proto-Norse, and the differences between those two languages, as well as the differences between those two languages, and modern Norwegian

IceyIcey
   Wed, 03/04/2024 - 16:54

That's quite a big question, let's see...

Let's start from saying that "modern Norwegian" doesn't actually exist. When you talk about Norwegian, what you mean are two different written forms (bokmål and nynorsk) and a wide variety of dialects spoken in Norway, which differ one from the other at different degrees, some quite significant. The closest overlapping you have between one of these written forms and a spoken dialect occurs with bokmål and the dialect of Norwegian spoken in Oslo, which coincide not perfectly, but significantly.

Dano-Norwegian was an old variety of Norwegian which started to develop when Norway became a part of Denmark and started using the Danish written standard, but pronouncing it as though it were Norwegian. Simply put, they wrote in Danish, but read in Norwegian. Modern days bokmål writing derives from this use of the language. This variety covers a long period of time (almost 3 centuries), so we're talking about not one language, but several varieties that changed significantly from 1500s to 1800s. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dano-Norwegian

Old Norse is an umbrella term used to indicate several varieties of Nordic languages spoken between the 8th and 15th century (again, a very long period of time, so we're actually talking about several varieties of languages that changed significantly over time). Roughly speaking, Old Norse is divided into two main macro-dialects: Old West Norse and Old East Norse. These two macro categories can be further divided into more varieties. The western variety is the most attested one, and is thus the most studied by sheer amount of material, especially when it comes to Old Icelandic, though Old Norwegian is also widely attested. Modern Norwegian dialects have changed a lot since the times of Old Norse, and none of them, not even the most conservative ones, will grant you easy access to texts that old. Unlike Icelandic, which has remained relatively unchanged since the times of Old Icelandic, especially in the written form, and is therefore a very useful tool to step into the world of Old Norse texts.

Proto-Norse is the common ancestor to all modern Nordic languages. It's the oldest (2nd to 8th century) attested variety of North Germanic language we have, but the corpus of texts (all of which come from short runic inscriptions, mostly from rune stones) is still small and thus a comprehensive study of the whole language is hard to pull. Best we can do is deduce a few common guidelines, but nothing as detailed as Old Icelandic texts allow.

SirquacksSirquacks    Wed, 03/04/2024 - 17:07

Thankyou for your reply! That is very interesting, and something I only had a surface level knowledge of.
So, in terms of learning old-Norse and Proto-Norse, where would you suggest I should start? Should I start dabbling in learning Icelandic? What I’m grasping from this, is that with dano-Norwegian, if I can write and understand written Danish, I would be able to understand written dano-Norwegian? As for the spoken part of it, I would need to be able to understand Norwegian? I have a basic understanding of both, so that is why I ask

IceyIcey
   Wed, 03/04/2024 - 17:43

Since Dano-Norwegian has not been a thing in a very long time, I doubt you'll ever find yourself in need of understanding its "spoken part". Your level of understanding of the written texts depends highly both on your level of Danish and Norwegian, as well as how actually old the text at hand is. As I said, Dano-Norwegian spans over 300 years, and understanding a text from 1821 is a whole other thing than reading a text from 1592.

Icelandic is certainly a good starting point to approach Old Norse, surely one of the more accessible. Proto-Norse on the other hand is not exactly "learnable", as I said above, because we lack a complete grammar of it that can be learnt, only tids and bits extrapolated from the few written sources we have. The little we know about it requires undoubtedly a thorough study of runology, as Proto-Norse inscriptions, for all the aforementioned reasons, account for the most obscure and indecipherable part of the whole corpus of runic inscriptions discovered so far.

SirquacksSirquacks    Wed, 03/04/2024 - 19:08

I see, Thankyou for the help! I have been interested in learning Icelandic for a tiny bit, and now I have even more of a reason to learn it. And thank you for your help with my dano-Norwegian questions, I will keep these in mind if I ever come across it